In Thailand’s adversarial legal system, the proper handling of evidence plays a critical role in both civil and criminal litigation. Among all types of admissible materials, documentary evidence in Thailand holds particular significance. However, what happens when such evidence was not listed in advance in the witness list but is introduced during cross-examination?

This article, authored with insights from a lead law firm in Bangkok, explains the legal principles and strategic techniques that allow documentary or material evidence to be admitted into court without prior registration—under specific conditions.

---

📚 The Role of Documentary Evidence in Thai Litigation

Documentary evidence refers to any physical or digital material that contains recorded information and can be presented to support or refute a fact in issue. In Thailand, this may include:

• Written contracts or agreements

• Official correspondence or notices

• Chat messages (e.g., LINE, Facebook Messenger)

• Photographs or video clips

• Social media posts

• Medical records or police reports

Under Section 94 of the Civil Procedure Code and the Criminal Procedure Code of Thailand, all evidence must be presented to the court through a structured and fair process. Normally, parties are required to:

• Submit a witness list and exhibit list to the court

• Serve these documents to the opposing party in advance

• Ensure that evidence is properly introduced via examination-in-chief

However, Thai law does not operate in absolutes—there are exceptions that seasoned litigators can leverage.

---

⚖️ The General Rule: Evidence Must Be Listed in Advance

Under both civil and criminal procedure, evidence that is not listed in the witness and exhibit list is typically inadmissible unless:

1. The court permits it under special circumstances; or

2. It is introduced and admitted through cross-examination, a nuanced area explored below.

The primary rationale for requiring advance notice is to ensure procedural fairness, giving the opposing party the opportunity to review, object, or prepare rebuttal to the evidence.

---

🧠 The Legal Exception: Admission via Cross-Examination

Under Thai procedural rules, if a witness under cross-examination is shown an unlisted document or object, and they recognize or affirm it, then that evidence may be admitted by the court at its discretion.

✅ Recognition or Affirmation may include:

• Acknowledging the existence or authenticity of the document

• Admitting to having signed or created the document

• Confirming involvement, such as appearing in a photo or chat log

• Not denying authorship or connection to the evidence

Once the witness affirms the document’s validity or relevance, Thai courts may exercise discretion to accept the evidence, even though it was not submitted in the pre-trial list.

This technique is frequently used in cross-examination to elicit spontaneous admissions that authenticate new evidence.

🛡️ Example: A party did not list a LINE chat screenshot between the plaintiff and the defendant. During cross-examination, the plaintiff confirms that the messages were real and accurately reflect the conversation. The court may allow the chat as admissible evidence—even if it was not listed in advance.

---

❌ When the Evidence Will Be Rejected

Thai courts are unlikely to admit unlisted documentary evidence when:

• The witness denies the document’s authenticity

• The witness refuses to recognize or recall the material

• The party presenting the document fails to establish its connection to the case

• The attempt to submit evidence violates procedural fairness

If the document is denied by the witness and not otherwise proven, the court may sustain objections from the opposing party, especially if it causes prejudice or disrupts fair trial rights.

---

🎯 Practical Litigation Strategy: A Tool for Skilled Advocates

The ability to introduce unlisted documentary evidence in Thailand hinges not only on legal rules but also on advocacy skills. Lawyers must:

• Ask leading and precise questions

• Anticipate the witness’s likely response

• Present the document at the right moment

• Frame the document as something the witness is likely to admit or relate to

This technique is particularly useful in cases where:

• The opposing party may not anticipate the document

• There is a strategic need for surprise

• The document came into the lawyer’s possession late in the process

🎓 For legal professionals preparing for the Thai Bar Exam or judicial service examinations, this rule represents a classic “gray zone” of legal interpretation and courtroom strategy.

---

📌 Legal Precedents and Academic Commentary

Although not often highlighted in published case law, Thai court practice recognizes this exception. The Discretion of the Court plays a vital role. Judges will assess:

• The credibility of the witness

• The document’s relevance and probative value

• The procedural integrity of the questioning process

Academic discussions, such as in the Thai Journal of Justice or publications from the Judicial Training Institute, often reference this as a nuanced area that distinguishes advanced courtroom advocacy.

---

🌐 External Resources

To explore more on Thai evidence law and court procedure, the following official resources may be helpful:

• Office of the Judiciary of Thailand (ศาลยุติธรรม)

• Thai Laws and Legal Framework (Law Library)

• Thailand Criminal Procedure Code (unofficial English translation)

---

👩‍⚖️ Consult the Lead Law Firm in Bangkok

Navigating evidentiary issues without violating procedural rights requires both substantive knowledge and strategic thinking. At Siam Center Law Group, a lead law firm in Bangkok, our experienced litigators provide clients with effective courtroom representation grounded in a deep understanding of Thai procedural law.

✉️ Contact us today for a consultation if you are involved in litigation and need to explore your options for introducing documentary or material evidence—even when time or procedural barriers exist.

---

🔍 Conclusion

Documentary evidence in Thailand is a cornerstone of fair trial rights, but Thai law provides room for legal ingenuity, especially during cross-examination. Whether you’re a practicing attorney, law student, or party to a case, understanding how to navigate these exceptions can significantly shift the trajectory of a trial.

Trust a lead law firm in Bangkok to help you master the rules—and the strategy—of courtroom evidence.